Areas of Expertise
My work sits at the intersection of psychology, trauma, behavioral health, leadership, and organizational life. While these areas are often considered separately, I am particularly interested in the places where they meet—and in how our inner capacities, our relationships, and the environments and systems around us shape our ability to remain well and function effectively.
My perspective has been shaped by more than two decades of work across clinical psychology, behavioral health, military service, organizational leadership, consultation, and professional education. Across these different settings, I have become increasingly interested not only in what helps individuals heal and flourish, but in the conditions that allow people, teams, and organizations to do the same.
Trauma & Trauma Therapy
Trauma has been one of the central areas of my clinical work and professional study. As a clinical psychologist and trauma therapist, I have worked extensively with individuals experiencing post-traumatic stress, complex and developmental trauma, dissociation, attachment-related difficulties, addiction, eating disorders, and other ways that overwhelming experiences can shape our relationships with ourselves, other people, and the world around us.
My approach to trauma has been informed by advanced training in Sensorimotor Psychotherapy, mindfulness-based psychotherapy, mind-body medicine, traumatic grief, and other relational and body-oriented approaches to healing. Across these traditions, I have been particularly interested in understanding trauma not simply as something that happened in the past, but as something that can continue to shape the nervous system, relationships, patterns of protection, and our capacity to experience safety and connection in the present.
Although I am not currently engaged in direct clinical practice, my years as a trauma therapist continue to profoundly shape how I understand human behavior, resilience, leadership, relationships, and organizational life.
Trauma-Informed Practice
Trauma-informed practice asks us to move beyond understanding trauma solely as an individual clinical concern and consider how the environments we create can either support or undermine safety, agency, connection, and healing.
Throughout my career, I have helped develop trauma-informed clinical programs, trained professionals and organizations in trauma-informed approaches, and supported teams in translating an understanding of trauma and the nervous system into everyday practice. This work has spanned behavioral health, healthcare, military settings, community organizations, and other environments in which people regularly encounter stress, adversity, and human suffering.
At its best, trauma-informed practice is not simply a collection of techniques. It is a way of attending to the conditions we create around people: whether those conditions foster safety or threat, predictability or uncertainty, agency or powerlessness, connection or isolation. Increasingly, this understanding has also shaped how I think about leadership and organizational culture.
Behavioral Health & Wellbeing
My career has included clinical care, program development, multidisciplinary team leadership, behavioral health system development, military behavioral health, and consultation with organizations navigating questions of mental health and wellbeing.
These experiences have reinforced my belief that wellbeing cannot be understood solely as an individual responsibility. Our ability to remain healthy and effective is influenced by workload, relationships, leadership, organizational culture, access to support, opportunities for recovery, and the larger systems within which we work and live.
I am particularly interested in approaches to behavioral health that move beyond responding to distress after it occurs and instead ask how we can create environments that support human functioning before people reach a point of crisis. This includes attention to workforce wellbeing, prevention, connection, sustainable performance, and cultures in which seeking support is understood as part of health rather than evidence of failure.
Leadership & Organizational Culture
I understand leadership fundamentally as the stewardship of conditions.
Leaders cannot determine how another person will think, feel, or behave. They can, however, profoundly influence the environments in which people are asked to work. Leadership therefore involves attending not only to strategy, performance, and outcomes, but also to the relational and organizational conditions that shape whether people can contribute effectively.
My work in clinical leadership, military service, leadership development, executive coaching, and organizational consultation has led me to focus particularly on self-awareness, communication, relational trust, psychological safety, conflict, nervous system regulation, and the ways leaders influence the emotional and relational climate around them.
I am especially interested in what becomes possible when leadership is understood less as the exercise of control and more as responsibility for cultivating the conditions in which people and teams can do meaningful work, navigate challenge, remain connected, and flourish.
Resilience & Nervous System Regulation
Resilience is often described as an individual capacity—the ability to withstand adversity, recover from difficulty, or continue functioning under stress. My work has led me toward a more relational and systemic understanding.
Our nervous systems are continually responding to the environments around us. We regulate not only within ourselves, but through relationships with other people and through the larger conditions in which those relationships occur. Safety, connection, predictability, agency, and belonging can strengthen our capacity to meet challenge; chronic threat, isolation, uncertainty, and powerlessness can diminish it.
This understanding is central to my developing work on Nested Resilience, which considers resilience across interconnected levels: the individual, relationships, teams, and the larger organizational environment. Rather than asking only how individuals can become more resilient, this framework invites a broader question: What conditions help human beings remain connected, adaptive, and capable in the midst of challenge?